Snakehead Hype essays

Snakehead Hype essays The snakehead fish should not be completely prohibited. I believe it would be better to restrict it than completely banned. The media is using this small story and blowing it way out of proportion. They are taking advantage of the fact that most of the United States knows very little or nothing about fish, let alone snakeheads. With the media hyping up this story that forces the government take have to take action. So with the war on terrorism and the problems on Wall Street, the United States decides to declare war on the snakehead. I agree that the snakehead fish is a danger to our ecosystem, and if there are too many in the wild, they could extinguish lots of our native species because they have no natural predators here. If so, say the alarmists, we've got cause to worry. The snakehead can exceed 3 ft. in length and will eat pretty much anything that can fit into its jaws. What's more, the Patuxent River is only 75 yds away, and the fishwith an air sac in its digestive system that allows it to absorb oxygen, and the ability to flop its way across small stretches of muddy landcould soon wriggle into the nation's waterways. It is true that the snakehead fish can live on land for a short while, but it prefers not to. Snakeheads are nothing more than common swamp fish. In Southeast Asia, where they originate, they live in irrigation ditches and rice paddies, thriving there until the dry season, when their pools shrink and they squirm along to the next pocket of water. Such clumsy locomotion does not lend itse lf to wanderlust, and snakeheads in a good pond are likely to stay there forever. "Snakeheads are extremely lazy and sedentary," says Hawaii biologist Ron Weidenbach. Nor do they much care for airat least not the way they're said to. Reports had it that they can live on land for up to three days, but the best they usually seem to manage is several hours under wet burlap in open ...

These Ones vs. Those Ones

These Ones vs. Those Ones These Ones vs. Those Ones These Ones vs. Those Ones By Maeve Maddox A reader questions the use of the phrase â€Å"these ones†: I was wondering about a manner of speech I have been hearing or reading and that seems not right to my ears: it is â€Å"these ones† as in the following:   â€Å"If You Liked This Video, Youll LOVE These Ones†Ã‚   Isn’t the phrase complete with just â€Å"these†. I keep hearing or seeing this construction and it sounds really bad to my ear; is it just me? The construction is not new, although it seems to be more popular now than in the past. The Ngram Viewer shows the phrase â€Å"these ones† in moderate use from 1800 to the 1960s, when it begins a precipitate rise on the graph. Like the reader, I find â€Å"these ones†- and â€Å"those ones†- jarring. If I found either in a paper given me to correct, I would cross out ones in an instant. However, I can’t find a specific grammatical rule against it. Paul Brians (Common Errors In English Usage) proscribes it: By itself, there’s nothing wrong with the word â€Å"ones† as a plural: â€Å"surrounded by her loved ones.† However, â€Å"this one† should not be pluralized to â€Å"these ones.† Just say â€Å"these.† The same pattern applies to â€Å"those.† None of my other style guides reference the usage, and numerous online discussions defend it. An article at the Visual Thesaurus cites statistics from The British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) to show that British speakers say â€Å"these ones† five and a half times more often than speakers of American English. Nevertheless, in American usage, â€Å"these ones† is regarded as dialect and not standard usage. The problem is not that ones is being used as a plural or that these governs ones. For example, the following phrases are standard: I want the red ones. You always take the best ones. You take these small ones, and I’ll take those big ones. So why does â€Å"these small ones† pass with speakers who would not accept â€Å"these ones†? The reason may lie with the proximity of these to ones. With â€Å"these red ones,† the presence of the adjective red signals the brain that these is an adjective. When no other adjective intervenes between these and ones, the listener interprets these as a pronoun, in which case, ones is redundant. Because they are jarring to many speakers, the constructions â€Å"these ones† and â€Å"those ones† are best avoided in formal contexts, particularly in writing. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Handy Expressions About HandsYay, Hooray, Woo-hoo and Other Acclamations10 Types of Hyphenation Errors